What is more productive:killing terrorists or getting information from them?? It is certain that Obama has no clue as to the correct ansswer to this.

Well, as far as Midknight Review is concerned, with all the talk of Obama's "drone war," we have killed two top terrorist leaders -- we think -- and a number of low level terrorists. So, what's the problem, you ask ??

We are killing them, not trying to capture and interrogate them. . . . . .not trying to interrogate them at all.

In either case, when you kill a terrorist or give them their Miranda "rights" and tell them to stop talking, you cut yourself off from the stream of information so necessary to the successful pursuit of the terrorist war.

Therein is the dreadful failing that is Obama's terrorist "strategy." Understand that when we use the word "strategy," we imply that Obama actually has a plan. It is not enough to kill terrorist leaders in Afghanistan as if they are not connected to the "offensive" in the United States. Under Obama, we know less, far less, about terrorist specific intentions than we did under Bush. We have said it before and we say it again: before he gets gone, he may get us all killed.

If you feel safer under this Novice Man of War, it is because your husband is Chief of Police in Smalltown, North Dakota.
.
.

No comments:

Post a Comment