The case for WMD's just got a bit stronger with this WMD discovery.

The following post includes a detailed defense of Bush's Iraqi war effort based on WMD's -- a devastating defense, we might add.

Pictued left is the first admitted WMD found in Iraq. We do not know the date of this discovery, but the picture and story were released on Feb 5 of this year. It is a very recent find. The missile was found buried in the desert outside Baghdad.

Midknight Review wants its readers to know that this IS NOT THE FIRST WMD found in Iraq. Over the years, this editor has met and talked with two men who each spent three years or more in Iraq doing nothing but disarming WMD's. One worked for my business for a period of time and the other came to our church and spoke to a combined adult class. Both were confused as to why the Bush Administration never put this information out there. Both thought his silence might have something to do with the fact that most of these weapons had English lettering on them or on their containers, giving rise to the possibility that many of these weapons had been sold or somehow supplied to Saddam by the U.S. It certainly would not be the first time. A great deal of the weaponry used against American forces in Viet Nam was manufactured and sold to the enemy prior to that war.

More than this, we need to understand that Bush's first source of information concerning the existence of WMD's came from Bill Clinton !!! That's right -- Bill Clinton briefed Bush on their existence. Why do you think President Bush left the CIA intact ??? From top to bottom, Bush left that agency alone as he moved to install his administration into the government for which he was elected. George Tenet was Clinton's CIA chief advisor and he was telling Clinton and, then, Bush, of the existence of these weapons.

A second source of information establishing the fact of WMD's came from . . . . . . . . . . . . . Saddam Hussein !!! While our liberal Bush-hating detractors want to ignore this, the fact is that this is an established reality. It was not our nation's task to verify what the enemy claimed for itself . . . . especially when that enemy's army was shooting at our aircraft on a daily basis, planning assassination attempts on Bush 41 and Bill Clinton and killing its own people with WMD's. Iraq had refused 14 orders from the UN to demonstrate a full-on abandonment of their WMD's. Why did the U.N. issue such an orders? There are two reasons: 1) Saddam's claim to own WMD's and 2) the fact that he had used them to kill thousands of his own people.

A third source of information establishing the fact of WMD's came from (and we have already mentioned this) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . the folks at the United Nations. By the time Bush 43 had taken office, Iraq had received more than 12 UN orders demanding that it surrender its pool of WMD's. Let's keep in mind that Bush waited 14 months between announcing his intentions to attack and the actual invasion, itself. Saddam had 14 months to bury or export those weapons.

For Bush to refuse to act, he would have had to fly in the face of UN authority, Bill Clinton's advice as President of the United States, information coming from Clinton's CIA and Saddam Hussein, himself. Keep in mind that the continuation of the war was prosecuted with the clandestined discoveries (mentioned above) in mind. There can be no doubt that these men, folks we physically interviewed, we two of many employed by the military to disarm these weapons. Bush would have known about their work. Bush would have made the decision to continue the silence in this regard. After all, what value would there have been in admitting to their presence? Certainly, he would have been able to defend himself, but in so doing, he would have exposed the fact that past U.S. administrations had sold these very weapons to Iraq. In so doing, he ran the risk of humiliating his troops fighting for their lives, intensifying the war effort by the terrorists, not to mention the fact that such information would have been used by the terrorist to gain the upper hand in terms of the propaganda war. Say what you will about GW. This writer believes that he was a one of the more unselfish President's in American history. We did not like the idea that he spent like the President of Dubai - but he was one of our better Presidents, a man of faith and personal conviction, a Commander in Chief who cared for his troops and was respected if not loved by them, as well . . . . a very popular Commander in Chief.

The idiot claim that Bush made up the notion of WMD's to justify his invasion of Iraq is one of the more preposterous media lies of the Modern Marxist Error. If you disagree, please do not return to this review. We address our thoughts to those who read with a sense of "comprehension." You are not that person. Know this: when it was all said and done, George Bush won that war. Obama did not take over a war but a police action --- editor
.
.