You can go to Brietbart News, here, and read the related account. I did and came away totally confused. What I do know is what I see on this chart: (1) Our version of "global warming" did not begin until the late 1970's. (2) From 1975 thru 1995, the increase in global averages was .8 C 0 less than 1 degree. (3) From 1995 thru 2000, we have a very modest cooling trend of .2 degrees C. What we do not see, is a radical warming trend. Instead, after the temp spike beginning in the 1970's (don't forget there was a "mini ice age" in the early 70's), warming leveled off (20 years) and declined (the past 16 years).
Keep in mind that "global warming" only occurs regionally. Anytime you are talking about "global warming," you are talking about the average temp after combining all regions and striking an average. As it turns out, when we have a "global warming episode," some regions warming more than normal, a number of regions remain the same in terms of temp averages, and a number of regions cool - - - - - all during a "global warming"period of time. This is why you can have one of the coldest years on record (2010), "globally," while having a record cold winter in the Midwest REGION of the United States. In other words, "global" warming is a mathematical trick designed to scare the population. Take it to the bank.
ReplyDeleteQuestion... why is it that when you parrot a Breitbart study you never really show the qualifications of the 'scientists'? Why is it that almost 100% of these reports we find that they are written by people like this
You really do not pay any attention to whatever it is that you are responding to, do you?
DeleteExample: Talking about me parroting Breitbart. Why not go to that Breitbart article and see if you can find any of my words in that article. Get back to me, when that happens, Moron. Until then, stop embarrassing yourself.